Comparison
ShareTexts vs PairDrop
Both are browser-based file transfer tools. PairDrop focuses on local network discovery. ShareTexts adds pairing codes and text transfer.
ShareTexts
Pairing-code based. Works across any network. Adds text transfer, share links, and QR codes.
PairDrop
Self-hosted or public instance. Discovers devices on the same network. File transfer only.
Feature Comparison
| Dimension | ShareTexts | PairDrop |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | None — hosted service | Self-hosted or public instance |
| Account required | No | No |
| Network model | Any network (signaling server) | Same local network (mDNS/Bonjour) |
| Cross-network | Yes — devices can be anywhere | No — must be on same LAN |
| Pairing method | 6-digit code, QR, share link | Same-network discovery (auto) |
| Text transfer | Yes | No |
| File transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosting | Open source available | Docker, Node.js |
| Encryption | DTLS via WebRTC | DTLS via WebRTC |
| Offline | No (needs internet for pairing) | Yes (local network only) |
Where ShareTexts Is Useful
- Cross-network transfers — devices on different Wi-Fi networks, different locations
- Text transfer — links, code, notes between devices
- QR/pairing codes — no need for devices to discover each other
- Guest devices — works on any device with a browser
Where PairDrop Is Better
- Self-hosting — full control over your transfer infrastructure
- Local network speed — direct LAN transfer can be faster
- Offline — works without internet (same network only)
- Auto-discovery — no codes needed on same network
Choose ShareTexts if…
Devices are on different networks, you need text transfer, or you want a simpler pairing flow with codes and QR.
Choose PairDrop if…
Both devices are on the same local network, you want self-hosting control, or you need offline transfers without internet.